3 Million Hacked Hotel Keycards – What Could Go Wrong?

The current trajectory of technological advancement points towards a world where everyday objects are increasingly digitized and connected to the cloud, under the guise of immense convenience. From adjusting your fridge temperature with a simple tap to setting your television to your favorite show before you arrive home with your phone, this future is alluring.

However, amidst these conveniences lies a flip side – security concerns. There’s something inherently problematic about this tech-savvy future, especially when it comes to security. Engineers, developers, and designers often fail to prioritize security from the outset, and accountability is lacking. The recent headline-making incident involving the compromise of Saflok’s hotel lock system, potentially exposing three million hotel room locks, for example, clearly highlights this issue.

Vulnerabilities in Hotel Lock Systems

Following the audacious MGM hack last year by the infamous “Star Fraud” gang, which caused a staggering $30 million in potential loss, the hospitality industry finds itself again grappling with security concerns. The recent breach of Saflok’s hotel lock system left as many as 3 million hotel locks susceptible to unauthorized access within seconds, impacting numerous hospitality chains that rely on this system. This sophisticated yet relatively simple hack involved exploiting RFID and encryption mechanisms using a spare keycard.

Fortunately, ethical security researchers unearthed this vulnerability. In doing so, they illuminated weaknesses in both Dormakaba’s encryption and the underlying RFID system they employ, known as MIFARE Classic. Through exploitation of these vulnerabilities, the hackers demonstrated the alarming ease and speed with which Saflok keycard locks can be bypassed. Their method entails acquiring any keycard from a target hotel—whether by booking a room or obtaining a used keycard—then extracting a specific code from that card using a $300 RFID read-write device. Subsequently, they craft two new keycards of their own which, when tapped on a lock, alter a specific piece of the lock’s data then enable the second card to open it.

The full extent of vulnerabilities in unnecessarily web-connected devices remains uncertain. Furthermore, the widespread awareness of how easily these lock systems, among others, can be compromised raises significant concerns. While we remain hopeful that life and property will stay secure until these lock vulnerabilities are addressed, the reality is that resolving interconnected device issues will demand heightened awareness, time, and extensive manual intervention. It’s imperative that swift action is taken to fortify the security of these systems to protect the safety and privacy of guests. They also serve as a warning for other, similar vulnerabilities that exist.

Pitfalls of Over-Digitalization and Neglecting Security

The hotel keycard situation highlights significant concerns related to the rampant over-digitalization present in today’s world, coupled with an excessive reliance on convenience. The escalating dependence on digital security measures, exemplified by keyless entry systems for cars and smart locks for homes, presents a formidable security threat. We find ourselves in a troubling pattern of prioritizing convenience at the expense of security. This trend is exacerbated by the lack of tangible consequences for product designers failing to incorporate security, and the tendency towards abundance often present in many first-world countries.

In the era dominated by physical keys, a perceived sense of security prevailed. Typically only one available copy of a key existed, and duplication required physical access. However, the evolution toward digital keys introduces new vulnerabilities. The prevalence of vehicle thefts, facilitated by the remote copying of entry systems without any physical interaction, underscores this vulnerability. Likewise, the proliferation of vehicle apps enabling remote tracking and control poses significant security risks. The crucial question arises: do the conveniences offered by digital systems outweigh the associated risks? It’s a pressing dilemma demanding our attention, as we continually navigate the trade-off between convenience and security.

A Key With Significant Impact

The Saflok hotel lock exposure and its lessons should not be downplayed; its ramifications are vast, affecting individuals, businesses, and the broader tech industry:

  • Hotels rely on guest trust to maintain their reputation and business
  • Guests expect safety, which is why locks are installed in the first place
  • Hotels may face lawsuits from affected guests or be compelled to implement costly security upgrades

The exposure also has significant implications for manufacturers of digital lock systems, challenging the reliability and security of their products and potentially leading to a loss of customer trust, reduced sales, and the need for substantial security enhancements.

Reevaluating Security in Digital Technologies

For the security community, this incident should serve as a clarion call, ringing loud and clear to highlight the inherent vulnerabilities in digital systems. Such occurrences instill a healthy dose of skepticism regarding the security of digital systems, spanning from smart home devices to critical infrastructure. It’s a stark reminder that even seemingly minor conveniences can pave the way for significant security vulnerabilities and hackers.

As we march forward, the primary aim of new technologies must be to ensure that convenience never comes at the expense of security and privacy. It’s imperative we embark on a thorough reevaluation of how security is integrated into digital technologies, even if it entails refraining from digitization altogether. The time has come to halt unsafe technological practices and forge a future where innovation and security are synonymous. Only then can we truly harness the potential of digital advancements while safeguarding the integrity of our systems and the privacy of our data.

Looking for support in securing your systems and data? Send us a request to get started.


This article was originally published in Forbes.

A Season Of Health Breaches, A Season Of Changes

As spring ushers in a season of transformation, the healthcare sector finds itself at a crossroads, compelled to evolve rapidly in response to a series of recent, high-profile cyberattacks. One of the most significant incidents is the hack of Change Healthcare, a pivotal player in the U.S. healthcare system and a subsidiary of UnitedHealth. This organization, responsible for processing insurance and billing for hundreds of thousands of hospitals, pharmacies, and medical practices, holds sensitive health information on nearly half of all Americans. The breach profoundly impacted major entities like UnitedHealth, Walgreens, and CVS, carrying hefty financial repercussions and deeply affecting patient health. This incident underlines the critical need for systemic enhancements in cybersecurity and urgent reforms to safeguard sensitive data across the industry.

“Change” Was Changed

Following a cyberattack on February 21, UnitedHealth’s Change Healthcare continues to process over $14 billion of backlogged claims. UnitedHealth Group announced expectations for major clearinghouses to resume operations after a month-long effort to recover services that were disrupted nationwide, prompting a federal investigation. While critical services at Change Healthcare have been restored, UnitedHealth is cooperating with a HIPAA compliance investigation initiated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Addressing these issues will occupy Change Healthcare for the foreseeable future.

The outage, caused by a cyberattack from the ransomware gang known as ‘Blackcat,’ disrupted prescription deliveries and affected pharmacies across the country for multiple days. The breach continues to be investigated. Despite a recent crackdown on Blackcat, which included seizing its websites and decrypting keys, the hacker gang struck major businesses prior to this event and continues to threaten retaliation against critical infrastructure and hospitals in its wake.

A Sophisticated One-Two Punch

The health tech giant reportedly paid $22 million to ALPHV in March. Shortly after, a new hacking group began publishing portions of the stolen data in an effort to extort a second ransom payment from the company. The new gang, which calls itself RansomHub, published several files on the dark web that contained personal information about patients across an array of documents, some of which included internal files. RansomHub has stated it would sell the stolen data unless Change Healthcare paid a second ransom.

These recent incidents carry significant financial burdens and deeply impact patient health, emphasizing the urgent need for systemic change to bolster cybersecurity measures across the healthcare sector.

Change Now or Pay [Even More] Later

As of mid-April, UnitedHealth reported that the ransomware attack has cost more than $870 million in losses. Importantly, this is not the first—or only—time an organization has found itself exposed to such vulnerabilities. The recurring nature of these breaches underscores the urgent need for a paradigm shift in how the healthcare industry approaches cybersecurity. It’s not just about patching vulnerabilities as they arise, but fundamentally rethinking and fortifying digital defenses to withstand the relentless onslaught of cyber threats in today’s world. The cost of preventing such an attack could have been a small fraction of the $870 million paid in remediation costs.

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure

At the heart of the matter lies a complex web of security vulnerabilities. While healthcare organizations typically invest significant resources in securing their digital infrastructure, the recent breach underscores the sobering reality that even the most robust defenses can be compromised through misguided and parochial mindsets. Since the breach, it’s been revealed that only half of systems were adequately secured and patched, leaving a glaring gap that cybercriminals exploited with devastating consequences. This situation should serve as a catalyst for transformative change in the culture of Healthcare IT, prompting a reevaluation of existing security protocols and increased fortification of defenses through partnerships with capable service organizations.

These breaches, still unfolding, serve as a stark reminder of the constant vigilance required to protect against malicious cyberattacks in an industry where the stakes are exceptionally high, measured in human lives and the confidentiality of sensitive medical information. It is critical that the approach to cybersecurity strategies and implementations extends beyond traditional ROI calculations and reliance on already overstretched internal IT teams.

Check Box Compliance

When examining the breach, a crucial aspect to look at is the period of technological transition that at least one of the impacted organizations was navigating when the incidents occurred. Technology inherently evolves, yet it was during a pivotal moment of updating systems that the attackers found and exploited vulnerabilities. This situation starkly highlights the sophistication of cybercriminals in pinpointing and exploiting periods of vulnerability, reminding us of their relentless watchfulness for opportunities to infiltrate systems amidst organizational changes.

Moreover, this breach raises pertinent questions about the efficacy of regulatory compliance frameworks. These situations are heaped with compliance, however being compliant with industry regulations regarding the protection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) health data clearly does not prevent incidents from occurring.

Healthcare Cybersecurity: A Call to Action

As we continue to navigate the relentless tide of cyber threats, the healthcare industry must confront the new realities of digital warfare that endanger countless lives and sensitive data. This challenge transcends the need for incremental changes; it calls for a revolutionary overhaul of our cybersecurity frameworks, strategies, and ROI models.

The recent breaches are a stark wake-up call, emphasizing the necessity for proactive and comprehensive security that anticipates threats before they emerge. It is crucial for healthcare leaders to prioritize investments in advanced security technologies and to cultivate a culture of collaboration by partnering with expert security service providers. These partnerships can integrate cyber resilience into the fabric of healthcare delivery. The cost of inaction is unacceptably high, not only in terms of financial losses but also in the erosion of patient trust, privacy, and wellbeing. Let us commit to safeguarding our future with every resource available, making security synonymous with healthcare itself.

Need to reevaluate your existing security protocols? Want to implement a more comprehensive and proactive approach? Contact us to get started.


This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Election 2024: Championing Proactive Cybersecurity To Fortify National Security

The 2024 election presents a pivotal moment for national security, particularly through the lens of cybersecurity. Amid widespread discussion on the perceived shortcomings of United States presidential candidates, a policy domain with the potential for broad consensus emerges: cybersecurity. This issue transcends political divisions, posing a universal challenge to advocates of peace and democracy across the political spectrum. It offers a unique opportunity not only to unite with allies, but to extend olive branches to global adversaries through cooperative efforts.

As we explore our national priorities and hopes for the future, the forthcoming election brings the significance of cybersecurity policies to the forefront. It demands that candidates clarify their positions on adopting proactive cybersecurity measures. Cybersecurity is not only central to national security dialogues, but increasingly impacting our day to day activities, requiring we delve into the specific policies, practices, and technological innovations that define an advanced cybersecurity strategy. This strategy is crucial not just for presidential hopefuls, but for gubernatorial, mayoral, and congressional candidates. Related discussions should underscore the critical need to employ technology and foster policy-led partnerships to develop a robust digital infrastructure, which is proactive, resilient, and ready to tackle the cybersecurity challenges of tomorrow.

Advocating for Proactive Cybersecurity Measures

Advocating for proactive cybersecurity measures is pivotal, as is emphasizing prevention over reaction. This approach entails several critical policies and technologies, which candidates can champion in their platforms:

  • Comprehensive Risk Assessments: Regular, in-depth evaluations of government and critical infrastructure networks are essential to uncover vulnerabilities and anticipate threats.
  • Early Adoption of Emerging Technologies: Commitment to the latest advancements, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), is crucial for predictive threat analysis, anomaly detection, and orchestrating automated responses.
  • Strengthening Cyber Hygiene: Advocating for stringent cyber hygiene practices across both government entities and the private sector is vital. This means ensuring regular software updates, implementing strong password policies, and conducting thorough employee training programs.

The value of AI and ML in supporting the shift from reactive to proactive cybersecurity cannot be overstated. By integrating these technologies into national cybersecurity strategies, candidates can support key activities:

  • Automated Threat Intelligence: Leveraging AI to sift through global threat data enables the anticipation and neutralization of cyberattacks with real-time defense mechanisms.
  • Behavioral Analytics: Utilizing ML to scrutinize network behavior allows for the identification of anomalies that could signal potential threats, facilitating early intervention.
  • Enhanced Incident Response: AI enhances the development of rapid and more effective response strategies, significantly mitigating the repercussions of any breaches.

Safeguarding Porous Cyber Borders

Protecting against the permeability of cyber borders necessitates a multifaceted approach that combines technology with human insight. This approach is underpinned by a commitment to a robust security culture that acknowledges our collective responsibility in upholding high security standards through:

  • Education and Awareness Programs: Enhancing cybersecurity knowledge at all levels of education and providing continuous training for both government personnel and the general populace.
  • Encouraging Responsible Innovation: Promoting the integration of ethical considerations and security measures in the development of new technologies and digital services.

Despite the internet’s borderless nature, the definition and protection of cyber borders are imperative. Candidates should advocate for international collaboration and frameworks that extend cybersecurity efforts beyond national boundaries, including:

  • Global Cybersecurity Alliances: Strengthening alliances with global partners to facilitate the exchange of threat intelligence, share best practices, and orchestrate coordinated responses to cyber incidents. This initiative should also consider building cybersecurity partnerships with political adversaries, potentially as a cornerstone of future trade agreements.
  • Regulatory and Legal Frameworks: Developing comprehensive laws and international agreements aimed at bolstering cross-border cooperation in cybersecurity operations and the prosecution of cybercrime.
  • Public-Private Partnerships: Encouraging a synergistic relationship between government agencies and the technology sector, leveraging the latter’s innovative capabilities and responsiveness to effectively address cybersecurity challenges.

Prioritizing Cybersecurity to Secure our Digital Future: A Call to Action for Candidates

As we approach the 2024 election, the importance of cybersecurity cannot be overstated. The outlined strategies and policies represent a blueprint for national resilience in the face of digital threats to our banking sector, our health care sector, and even our emerging electrical vehicle sector.

This is a call to action for the top presidential candidates to prioritize and articulate robust cybersecurity platforms. By choosing a proactive cybersecurity approach, emphasizing comprehensive risk assessments, leveraging AI and ML technologies, promoting global cooperation, and fostering a culture of security, candidates can demonstrate their commitment to safeguarding our nation’s digital infrastructure.

This commitment will not only enhance national security, but provide voters with a clear basis to assess which candidate is best equipped to navigate the complexities of our modern cyber landscape. It’s imperative for leading figures to embrace these principles, showing preparedness to lead and protect, as so many of our future innovations are at stake. As voters, we must demand dedication to cybersecurity from our future leaders, recognizing that the safety of our digital future hangs in the balance.

Need to better prioritize cybersecurity within your organization? Contact us to get started.


This article was originally published on Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

The Critical Role Of Cybersecurity In Election Years

As election season heats up, we are navigating through a multitude of issues within our deeply divided society. While politicians often campaign on platforms shaped by fear or designed to appeal to special interest voting blocs, we rarely see politics directly intertwined with cybersecurity. Yet, in election years—especially this one—the topic of cybersecurity assumes unprecedented importance. The hacking and distribution of Hillary Clinton’s private emails in 2016 on her campaign, for example, is an event with significant impact that cannot be ignored, and arguably cost her the election. Past occurrences like this underscore the importance of not only focusing on candidates’ visions for the future, but also examining their cybersecurity campaign readiness and policy frameworks.

Digital threats pose a substantial risk to national security. Consequently, the electorate should demand clarity on how prospective leaders intend to navigate the intricate landscape of cyber threats. Will their strategies be reactive, addressing threats as they emerge, or proactive, anticipating challenges and reinforcing defenses in advance? The management of campaign IT assets should also be under scrutiny, especially from donors and lobbying groups with deep pockets. This distinction is pivotal, as the integrity of our democratic processes and protection of our digital borders hang in the balance.

The Imperative for Candidate Clarity on Cybersecurity

In our overwhelmingly digital age, a candidate’s position on cybersecurity should be deemed as crucial as their policies on the economy, health, and defense. Voters and technologists alike seek candidates who can articulate clear, comprehensive cybersecurity strategies that transcend mere rhetoric.

The complexity and constantly evolving nature of cyber threats necessitate the involvement of experts. This means technologists, cybersecurity professionals, and AI specialists must play a pivotal role in campaigns and help shape policies that are both realistic and forward-thinking. As candidates formulate their cybersecurity agendas, integrating input from these experts—who may also be their constituents—can offer invaluable insights into the latest cyber threat trends, effective defense technologies, and implications of emerging technologies on national security.

Is Cybersecurity The Achilles’ Heel Of The Electric Vehicle Revolution?

The electric vehicle (EV) sector, though nascent and in its formative years, faces numerous challenges. Recent concerns, such as “range anxiety” (a vehicle battery’s charge and ability to complete a planned journey) among consumers and incidents of vehicles losing power in cold temperatures, have contributed to a slowdown in adoption. While the trajectory of electric vehicle integration into our lives remains uncertain, one critical issue demands attention but does not get a lot of press: cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

The cybersecurity aspect of technology-enabled objects, often overlooked beyond the speculative realms of dystopian narratives like the apocalyptic film “Leave The World Behind,” poses a significant threat to the industry’s future. Addressing cybersecurity is not just about safeguarding digital infrastructure, but ensuring the foundational trust and reliability essential for the EV revolution. This underscores a broader principle that systems, EV or otherwise, must be designed with security as a core consideration. Integrating robust cybersecurity measures from the outset is vital to protecting both the technology itself and the users who depend on it, and in establishing a secure and resilient foundation for the future of mobility.

Unseen Dangers: Electric Vehicle Cyber Threats

As electric vehicles rise in popularity hackers lie in wait, eager to exploit the burgeoning network of digital connections EVs depend on. As these vehicles become increasingly interconnected and reliant on digital technologies they offer more points of entry for malicious activities, a reality that highlights the critical need for cybersecurity diligence given lives and safety are at stake. The following threats to EVs highlight pressing cyber challenges:

  • Signal Interception: Hackers have the capability to intercept wireless fob signals, fooling a vehicle into thinking the fob is nearby and granting unauthorized access.
  • Introduction of Malicious Software: Vulnerable charging stations can become conduits for hackers to install harmful software, compromising vehicle safety and functionality.
  • Exposure of Security Vulnerabilities: Security reviews often expose significant gaps in charging equipment, including the leakage of sensitive information like usernames, passwords, and credentials.
  • Risk of Malware: Publicly available Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) is susceptible to malware attacks, threatening the integrity of crucial charging infrastructure.
  • Threats to Grid-Connected EVSE: Cyberattacks on grid-connected EVSEs pose a risk of causing widespread disruptions in the electric distribution system, affecting countless users.

A Systemic Vulnerability

The EV ecosystem, which incorporates technologies such as wireless, cloud, and healthtech, represents a comprehensive network inherently vulnerable to cyber threats. This convergence of technology not only advances the capabilities and convenience of EVs, but also introduces a range of challenges. The decentralized, distributed, and interconnected nature of EV digital systems calls for an increased vigilance and proactive approach to cybersecurity. Ensuring the security of EV infrastructure is a matter of public safety, and essential for protecting the lives of vehicle owners and the broader community.

The Underbelly: Integrated Yet Vulnerable

Electric vehicles signify more than a shift in energy sources; they embody a profound transformation towards a technologically rich, digitally integrated automotive landscape. Consider the example of a standard Tesla, brimming with computational might and boasting an extensive network of digital processing modules that orchestrate everything from vehicle operations to driver experience.

Despite being a technological marvel, it comes with its share of vulnerabilities. The spectrum of risks ranges from hacking attempts that could compromise vehicle functionality to sophisticated attacks targeting operational technologies to breaches that threaten data privacy. The criticality of cybersecurity in the evolution of EV adoption is unmistakable. Securing the EV infrastructure and its intricate supply chain is paramount to mitigating potential exploits from cyberattacks. Adherence to rigorous cybersecurity protocols and industry-wide standards is indispensable for ensuring seamless and secure integration of EVs into our daily transportation framework, and for safeguarding the future of mobility against emerging cyber threats.

Navigating the Complexities of a Digital Automotive Landscape

Although consumers often overlook the complexities behind the products they regularly use, this luxury is not afforded to manufacturers — especially within the EV industry. The sector is distinguished by its global, intricate supply chains, deeply dependent on electronic components, many of which are sourced from a select few suppliers in Southeast Asia. Reliance on such a concentrated supplier base introduces a layer of vulnerability that can be further exacerbated by the region’s political climate.

The potential for a single failure point within this supply chain to precipitate widespread disruption cannot be understated. For instance, the recent withdrawal of autonomous Cruise vehicles from San Francisco and Austin highlights the tangible risks associated with software glitches in advanced automotive technologies. Cruise, a San Francisco-based self-driving car company and a subsidiary of General Motors (GM), faced severe repercussions when programming issues led to an incident involving a pedestrian. Such incidents vividly illustrate the critical need for robust software integrity in the evolving automotive landscape.

Imagine the ripple effects of a prolonged disruption at a semiconductor plant on multiple industries, or the impact of a parts shortage at EV charging stations. More critically, consider how cybersecurity breaches or operational shutdowns in any sector of the industry could jeopardize not just the mechanics of vehicle operation but also the privacy or even physical safety of its users.

Beyond safeguarding operational integrity, cybersecurity measures are fundamental to maintaining vehicle upkeep, ensuring the safety of production processes, protecting driver safety, securing user privacy, and preserving the interconnected fabric of the entire industry. The growth of the EV market hinges on adopting a proactive approach to cyber challenges and necessitates an industry-wide commitment to robust security practices.

Securing Trust in the Electric Vehicle Ecosystem

Consumer trust is pivotal for the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). The discerning public is quick to identify and react to any perceived shortcomings or risks that could affect their safety, privacy, or the reliability of their transportation solutions. Consumers must feel confident in the safety of vehicles, assured their personal information is protected, and comfortable the dependability of charging infrastructure free from fraud and operational risks.

To foster such confidence, the EV industry must adhere to stringent security standards and commit to a culture of comprehensive security practices. Awareness of vehicle availability, access to parts, and reliable maintenance services also play a significant role in building this trust. By implementing robust cyber risk management strategies, adhering to strong security principles, embracing continuous improvement, and maintaining constant vigilance, companies within the EV sector can navigate the complexities of this rapidly evolving marketplace. This approach prepares them to face security challenges and positions them at the forefront of the industry, ready to lead in what promises to be a transformative era in transportation.

Wondering what security threats or vulnerabilities your organization could be facing? Contact us to learn more about the best way to mitigate threats and implement proactive security you can trust.


This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Beyond Fiction: ‘Leave The World Behind’ And The Urgent Call For Cybersecurity Vigilance

In late 2023, a fascinating film titled ‘Leave the World Behind’ emerged on Netflix, creating considerable buzz with its cybersecurity-related themes. The film boasts major stars such as Julia Roberts, Mahershala Ali, and Kevin Bacon. Former U.S. President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama served as executive producers of the film, which was based upon a novel Obama included on his 2021 summer reading list.

Mainstream films often reflect our society and the issues we face, a topic I’ve explored with a past post on cyber movie favorites. One of the standout aspects of this latest film is its technology-themed transitions from paranoia and Big Brother scenarios to cyber fantasy and cyberattack plotlines. Paranoia, uncertainty, and isolation form the core of this movie, but it all begins with a debilitating, existential cyberattack on the US. In today’s cyber age where we frequently hear about cyber failures and incidents, this fictional attack represents a total impact event that exposes interdependent fragilities that may not have a foundation in reality.

A “What If?” Scenario

Those expecting precise depictions of cybersecurity events may find themselves underwhelmed by the film’s superficial treatment of technical details, and enthusiasts eager for even a rudimentary understanding of the technology involved might feel the film falls short. It’s important to recognize, though, that the general populace, often the victims of significant cyber incidents, typically do not delve into the complexities behind these attacks.

The movie prompts us to consider a range of ‘what if’ and ‘is that realistic?’ questions. A theme previously broached is the potential for a cyberattack to escalate into an actual kinetic conflict. The narrative explores this scenario, depicting a multinational cyber onslaught against the US, a nod to the nation’s intricate and sometimes contentious international engagements. While state-sponsored cyber activities aimed at financial gain, leverage, and strategic advantage are rampant, full-scale existential digital attacks as the film suggests are simply overstated. The global interdependence of economies, investment flows, supply chains, and the looming threat of significant US retaliation make such an all-out digital assault less likely.

Stirring the Pot of Paranoia

The film utilizes paranoia as a crucial element of its emotional allure, underscoring the critical importance of security across all aspects of our lives, from essential utilities to the digital realms we frequent. Echoing the insights from the Colonial Pipeline attack, it highlights how the infrastructure of power stations and water facilities is meticulously designed to deter unauthorized access, along with the rigorous protocols in place at core facilities aimed at thwarting actions that could have a profound impact on society.

‘Leave the World Behind’ serves as a broad appeal, what if scenario that reignites our collective memory of the nuclear age’s fascination with potential apocalyptic events. This movie sidesteps logistical and technical specifics, diving straight into societal fears and reflections on technology. While it may not be a landmark cybersecurity film, it provides a decent measure of entertainment through painting a picture of a hypothetical disaster. In reality security is multifaceted, covering everything from human factors and identity protection to redundancy strategies and political measures. Comprehensive security was a missing factor from this film, and for good reason; without it, it was possible to build the unimaginable scenario depicted.

A Poignant Reminder for Comprehensive Security

‘Leave the World Behind’ not only serves as a thrilling exploration of societal collapse in the face of a catastrophic cyberattack, but also a poignant reminder of the vulnerabilities that pervade our interconnected digital world. While the film delves into the realm of the speculative and pushes the boundaries of what might be technically plausible, it inadvertently underscores the critical necessity for robust, comprehensive cybersecurity measures. The scenarios depicted, though dramatized, highlight the potential consequences of neglecting cybersecurity and in doing so make a compelling case for the importance of concerted efforts to strengthen our defenses against cyber threats. Although an attack of the magnitude portrayed in the movie is unlikely, the underlying message is clear: the need for vigilance, innovation, and collaboration in cybersecurity is more pressing than ever to safeguard our society.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Adapting To SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Requirements

The cybersecurity compliance landscape for public companies and foreign private issuers in the United States significantly evolved in 2023 with the introduction of new regulations by the SEC. Announced by SEC Chair Gary Gensler on July 26, 2023, these regulations mandate prompt disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents within four business days, except in circumstances where a delay is justifiable for national security or public safety reasons. Additionally, regulations require detailed annual reports on an entities’ cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance practices. Taking effect 30 days after the Federal Register publication in July, these rules aim to increase transparency for investors, companies, and the market by standardizing cybersecurity disclosures. They also highlight the SEC’s desire to enhance cybersecurity transparency.

Historical Context and Challenges

The regulations aim to address the underreporting of cyberattacks, a persistent issue that has limited both the government and industry’s ability to effectively respond to cyber threats. Despite encountering resistance, including from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Congress, and some SEC members, the rules necessitate thorough disclosure of the consequences of cyber breaches. This move towards transparency is designed to highlight the importance of cybersecurity protocols in response to the increasing frequency of cyberattacks disrupting various industries.

A Four-Day Reporting Mandate Amid Legislative Opposition

The requirement for public entities to report material cybersecurity incidents within four business days has sparked controversy and opposition from Congress. Recent efforts, led by figures such as Rep. Andrew Garbarino and Sen. Thom Tillis, seek to overturn the rule, citing conflicts with existing legislation like CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022) and concerns related to the over burdening cybersecurity professionals. This opposition underscores the tension between investor protection goals and the operational security of companies, balancing transparency with confidentiality.

Navigating the Complexities of Incident Materiality

Determining the materiality of a cybersecurity incident involves legal, preparedness, and technical considerations, focusing on the undeniable forensic details gathered post-event. Organizations face the challenge of distinguishing crucial information from irrelevant data during a crisis, emphasizing the importance of clear communication with shareholders about an incident’s impact.

Dual Challenges of Disclosure and Threat Management

The new disclosure requirements introduce a dual challenge for cybersecurity professionals: compliance and threat management, with the risk of increased targeting post-disclosure. The SEC offers some relief through delayed reporting under select conditions, emphasizing the critical need for cybersecurity preparedness among public companies.

The Crucial Roles of Cybersecurity and Compliance

The SEC’s new disclosure mandates highlight the critical importance for companies to either cultivate in-house expertise or form alliances with firms that specialize in both cybersecurity and compliance. Relying on compliance measures without implementing strong security protocols poses significant risks, just as emphasizing security without a framework for compliance may fail to provide clear accountability to investors and regulatory bodies. Companies are encouraged to build or seek out partnerships with entities proficient in navigating the complexities of both fields, thereby ensuring adherence to regulations and bolstering their defenses against cyber threats. This comprehensive approach is not only necessary to navigate the new regulations, but essential for protecting shareholder interests and maintaining the integrity of public confidence.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Protecting Intellectual Property In A Borderless World

Recent global and domestic headlines have highlighted discussions about borders and national sovereignty. It is a natural subject, given the concept of countries and borders has been a fundamental aspect of our world for centuries, shaping our identity, politics — and the way we perceive security. Given these challenges, it is prudent to question the significance of traditional borders and to explore a shift in focus towards bolstering the protection of intellectual property (IP), particularly in the context of cybersecurity. As we discussed in prior articles, several cyber groups, including those funded by foreign intelligence agencies such as China, Russia, and North Korea, are often more interested in IP theft than actual monetary gain.

The Borderless Concept

Dispensing with the idea of countries and borders might initially appear radical. But like it or not, the concept of a borderless world is something being pondered today. The notion of a world without borders has been the subject of discourse in various contexts, emphasizing a shift in focus from conventional territorial boundaries, trade, and territorial disputes. The borderless shift is not unlike the swift movement of global digital assets and commerce that describes modern commercial cloud systems. With so many critical cyber assets put into cyber infrastructures, many argue it is increasingly critical to prioritize issues that transcend physical borders, especially the safeguarding of intellectual property.

To put this into the context of intellectual property (IP) protection and national security, look no further than the news of a recent government panel and public statements made by FBI Director Christopher Wray. Topped off by Director Wray, the heads of intelligence agencies from the ‘Five Eyes’ alliance came together publicly for the first time to issue a dire warning about the growing threats to intellectual property posed by competing and threatening nations. Wray went on to call out one such nation, China, as the ‘defining threat of this generation’ in a ’60 Minutes’ panel.

Why Emphasize IP Protection?

Intellectual property encompasses a wide range of creations, from patents and copyrights to trademarks and trade secrets. Since the initial emergence of business computing, digital IP has become one of the most valuable assets for businesses and nations alike. Protecting intellectual property isn’t just about safeguarding corporate profits; it’s about maintaining technological leadership, fostering innovation, and ensuring national security.

The primary objectives of recent warnings are clear: Intellectual property protection must assume a central role in national security strategies. Here are several key reasons for this imperative:

  • Economic Resilience: Intellectual property theft exacts a considerable toll on the global economy, resulting in billions of dollars in annual losses. Nations with robust IP protections are better equipped to capitalize on innovation and safeguard their economic interests.
  • Fostering Innovation and Technology Leadership: Protecting IP instills confidence in innovators that their creations will remain secure, thereby promoting continuous innovation and maintaining global technological leadership.
  • Safeguarding National Security: In an era where technology and information are inextricably linked, the compromise of sensitive intellectual property can have severe repercussions for national security. From military technologies to critical infrastructure, IP theft can erode a nation’s ability to defend itself effectively.
  • Diplomatic Considerations: Intellectual property issues have emerged as a significant point of contention in international diplomacy. Addressing IP concerns diplomatically can help foster stable and peaceful international relations.

From Assets To Liability

IP can be a tremendous asset to a company, and can be thought of as their crown jewels. If it is stolen, only to be replicated without the cost of R&D, and the long development journey including the blood, sweat, and tears of the entrepreneur, it can be devastating. Emotions aside, IP thefts from hardware, to software, to services, have risen to become national security issue draining billions of GDP from our countries. The recent warnings by intelligence chiefs are just the tip of the iceberg, underscoring the urgency of this matter. By emphasizing IP protection, we not only safeguard economic interests but also bolster innovation, technological leadership, and national security. But where do we go from here?

2024: Strong Cybersecurity Principles Still Rule

The process to protecting IP – and national security – begins with implementing strong cybersecurity principles, Zero Trust architectures, continuous monitoring, and as-built security architected to the highest standards. Organizations play a critical role in the process, and must reassess priorities on behalf of their colleagues, their companies, and the nation. It is vital that we accord as much, if not more, significance to safeguarding intellectual property as we do to securing physical boundaries. The future of innovation, economic prosperity, and national security is inextricably linked to our commitment to this cause.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Harnessing The Power Of AI: Integrating AI Into Your Own Infrastructure

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into infrastructure has sparked widespread discussion in both private and public cloud domains. The transformative benefits of AI integration were a central theme in a panel discussion I recently participated in, showcasing AI’s potential to revolutionize various sectors.

Yet navigating the path to effective AI integration is complex, and many organizations appear to be taking a circuitous route. This article aims to demystify the process by exploring the fundamentals of AI integration into infrastructure and outlining the pivotal role of data lakes in unlocking AI’s full potential.

The Evolution of AI

AI’s journey from basic applications like chatbots and voice interactions to powering autonomous vehicles and beyond has been remarkable. AI applications now permeate numerous industries, offering enhanced efficiency, automation, and data-driven insights. We stand at the threshold of untapped AI potential, weighing the implications of our choices in this rapidly advancing field.

The Power of Your Own Data

A common misconception in AI adoption is the belief that simply turning on AI will yield immediate benefits. This approach often falls short, because generic AI platforms are typically built on non-specific – and mostly irrelevant – data. AI’s predictive capabilities hinge on specific, previously gathered data, and without it AI cannot replicate intelligent behavior accurately. Thus, the real power of AI for any organization lies in leveraging its own data. This approach underscores the significance of creating a data lake—a comprehensive, unified data repository—as the cornerstone of effective AI integration.

The Importance of Data Lakes

Creating a data lake is a strategic decision in the realm of AI integration, marking a shift from reliance on generic data sets to utilizing an organization’s unique data reservoir. This transition is not just a technical upgrade, but a transformative move towards a more personalized and powerful AI experience. Data lakes represent the convergence of vast amounts of diverse data in a centralized repository, poised for analytical processing and AI training.

By harnessing the potential of a data lake, organizations can significantly amplify the efficacy of their AI initiatives. Some of the compelling reasons to consider creating a data lake include:

  • Data Sovereignty: Training AI models with your own data ensures control over your information, which is critical in data-sensitive sectors. By owning the data, you can maintain the integrity and confidentiality of the information that feeds into your AI systems.
  • Customization: While pre-trained AI models are useful, they might not align perfectly with your unique needs. Data lakes allow for the customization of AI solutions, offering a tailored approach that aligns more closely with your business objectives and operational nuances.
  • Innovation: Your data is a treasure trove of insights. AI models fed with your data can reveal new trends and opportunities, which might go unseen with standard AI solutions. This process of discovery can lead to breakthroughs in product development, market strategies, and customer engagement.
  • Predictive Power: AI models trained on your data provide more accurate and relevant predictions, enhancing decision-making and competitive advantage. This predictive capability goes beyond responding to current trends to anticipating future shifts, thereby positioning your organization at the forefront of your industry.

Challenges and Considerations

While integrating AI into infrastructure through creation of data lakes is beneficial, as with anything it also comes with challenges:

  • Data Quality: The quality of data is crucial. Accurate, relevant, and current data are essential for effective AI outcomes.
  • Security and Compliance: With data being a prime target for hackers, robust security measures and compliance with regulations are paramount.
  • Scalability: Infrastructure must grow alongside your data, necessitating strong storage and computing capabilities.
  • Data Governance: Implementing data governance policies is key to protecting the sensitive information contained in data lakes.
  • AI Expertise: Expertise in AI model building and training is vital, often requiring investment in training or hiring specialists.

In addressing these challenges, it’s essential to recognize the value of seeking external expertise and partnerships. Technology firms that specialize in data lake creation and management can provide invaluable guidance and support through partnership. These experts bring a wealth of experience in navigating the complexities of data integration, migration, and management. Furthermore, they can assist in implementing robust security and governance frameworks, ensuring your data lake not only meets current needs, but is also scalable and compliant with evolving regulatory requirements. By collaborating with the right partners, organizations can accelerate their journey towards an effective and efficient AI-enabled infrastructure, and ensure the transition is as seamless and impactful as possible.

A Unique Business Opportunity

AI presents a unique business opportunity, and the trajectory of AI and infrastructure integration points towards:

  • AI-First Approach: AI will become integral to business strategies, impacting various functions from customer service to product development.
  • AI-Powered Decision-Making: Businesses will increasingly rely on AI for informed decision-making.
  • Enhanced Automation: AI will take over routine tasks, allowing human resources to focus on creative and strategic work.
  • Industry-Specific Solutions: Custom AI solutions tailored to specific industries will drive innovation and efficiency.

When aligned with a well-structured data lake and supported by scalable, secure enterprise systems, AI can unlock a plethora of possibilities. From generating data-driven insights to enhancing decision-making, the integration of AI is most effective when grounded in a solid data foundation.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.

Navigating Through Turbulence: Lessons for a Resilient 2024

2023 has been a tumultuous year, marked by multiple wars, naval blockades, massive demonstrations, economic uncertainty, and terrorist threats. Adding to this turmoil, a surge in cybersecurity attacks has intersected with financial instability and economic challenges, creating a ‘perfect storm’ with global implications. From the shocking breach at Mr. Cooper, to the ominous predictions by financial giants like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, the interconnectedness of vulnerabilities across sectors has become starkly apparent, demanding attention and immediate action.

A Convergence of Challenges in 2023

“Hacking” Shockwave: Mr. Cooper’s

The breach at Mr. Cooper, a key player in the mortgage loan services sector, sent shockwaves across the industry. Despite the organization’s mature cybersecurity practices, the incident forced a complete IT shutdown. This breach serves as a reminder that even the most robust systems are vulnerable to cyber threats. It further emphasizes the critical need for enhanced cybersecurity in an increasingly digitalized financial sector.

Commercial Debt Fallout: Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Brace for Impact

The potential commercial debt fallout anticipated by Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan is a clarion call to the fragility of the global economic ecosystem. The intersection of financial instability and cyber threats equates to a looming crisis, with potential to exacerbate existing economic challenges and affect not only individual organizations but entire economies.

Global Disruption: US30Y Auction Failures and ICBC Ransom Payment

The US30Y auction failure and the cyberattack at Allen & Overy last year, along with the ransom payment by ICBC, are additional red flags in the global economic landscape. These incidents underscore the systemic risk cyber threats pose to the global financial system and economies, risks that extend beyond financial instability to national security and public well-being.

Critical Infrastructure at Risk: Australia’s Ports and ICBC’s Unusual Settlement Methods

If the threats to Red Sea maritime traffic were not enough, the hacking incident at Australia’s ports and ICBC resorting to USB stick-based transactions additionally demonstrate critical infrastructure’s vulnerability to cyber attacks. These incidents highlight the necessity of robust cybersecurity measures to protect not only financial assets, but also our national security.

Market Volatility: DTCC’s Margin Requirement Doubling and South Korea’s Short Selling Ban

The DTCC’s decision to double margin requirements and South Korea’s ban on short selling reflect the prevailing volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets. These precautionary measures are reminiscent of responses to past financial crises, signaling a need for heightened vigilance and risk management in the year ahead.

Financial Market Unease: Warnings from the Federal Reserve and Corporate Bankruptcies

Warnings from Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook about a potential real estate disaster, coupled with corporate bankruptcies like WeWork’s and the ACH outage, contribute to the growing unease in financial markets. These developments call for prudent risk management and adaptability within financial strategies.

Dangerous Cyber Threats: A Glimpse into the Boeing Hack

To add to Boeing’s woes in the wake of falling panels from the sky, the recent hack of Boeing, resulting in sensitive files leaked online, is a stark reminder that no industry, including aerospace and defense, is immune to cyber threats. The implications for sensitive data and intellectual property are significant, impacting not only the individual businesses involved, but also national security.

Weathering the Perfect Storm in 2024

The convergence of financial instability, economic challenges, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities in 2023 paints a dire picture. As we step into 2024, it’s clear there is a pressing need for proactive and robust security measures to safeguard digital assets and financial systems. International collaboration and information sharing are key to fortifying against evolving threats. It is a call to action for governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize cybersecurity, risk management, and resilience in the face of this perfect storm. Only through concerted efforts can we hope to weather these challenges and emerge stronger.

This article was originally published in Forbes, please follow me on LinkedIn.